Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122796›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2025

COVIDmeter - a questionnaire-based symptom monitoring system for the surveillance of COVID-19 in Denmark, 2020-2023.

Pernille Kold Munch, Christian Holm Hansen, Frederik Trier Møller, Sarah Kristine Nørgaard, Aske Thorn Iversen, Ida Glode Helmuth, Steen Ethelberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pernille Kold MunchDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, https://ror.org/0417ye583Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1839-7435
Christian Holm HansenDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, https://ror.org/0417ye583Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederik Trier MøllerDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, https://ror.org/0417ye583Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1059-4661
Sarah Kristine NørgaardDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, https://ror.org/0417ye583Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Aske Thorn IversenDepartment of Epidemiological Research, https://ror.org/0417ye583Statens Serum Institut, Denmark.
Ida Glode HelmuthDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, https://ror.org/0417ye583Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steen EthelbergDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, https://ror.org/0417ye583Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9709-356X

Funding

Danish Government
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, Denmark launched COVIDmeter, a national participatory surveillance platform collecting real-time, self-reported symptoms from a community cohort, aimed to support early signal detection of COVID-like illness. This study describes the community cohort, the reported symptoms among persons testing positive and evaluates COVIDmeter's performance in detecting trends compared to other established surveillance indicators. A total of 143000 individuals registered as participants, of whom 98% completed at least one weekly questionnaire, resulting in approximately 5.8 million responses over the period from March 2020 to March 2023. Of those who tested positive, the most commonly reported symptoms overall were headache, fatigue, muscle or body aches, cough and fever. Trends in COVID-like illness followed similar patterns to other indicators, with COVID-like illness peaks often preceding increases in incidence and hospital admissions, suggesting early detection potential. The study demonstrated that participatory surveillance can serve as an early detection tool for tracking infection trends, particularly in the early stages of a pandemic. While subject to limitations such as selection bias and self-reporting inaccuracies and participatory symptom surveillance proved to be a rapid, scalable and cost-effective complement to traditional surveillance independent of virus testing, this highlights its relevance for future pandemic preparedness.

Indexed as

COVID-19Population SurveillanceAdolescentAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Self ReportSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultCOVID-19pandemicspublic health surveillanceSARS-CoV-2surveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID41122796
PMCPMC12722544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.