ArticleRevista espanola de sanidad penitenciaria
Training program on motivational interviewing for prison professionals.
Article in Revista espanola de sanidad penitenciaria. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of a motivational interviewing (MI) training program for prison professionals by analysing the progression of MI-compatible competence and adherence, as well as the reduction of non-compatible practices. Material and method: A longitudinal quasi-experimental study with repeated measures was conducted over four months at three time points. A total of 25 correctional professionals participated in a three-phase training program. A Spanish-translated version of the Motivational Interviewing Assessment: Supervisory Tools for Enhancing Proficiency (MIA:STEP) questionnaire from Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) was used for self-assessment. Statistical analyses included repeated measures ANOVA, Friedman's test, effect size (h Results: Non-compatible adherence to MI significantly decreased ( Discussion: The program was effective in significantly reducing non-compatible adherence to MI, which emerged as the most substantial outcome. While compatible adherence fluctuated and compatible competence exhibited a differentiated progression depending on the statistical test used, the findings indicate progressive learning and areas requiring further reinforcement. The ecological validity of the study design strengthens the applicability of the results, providing evidence of the impact of MI training in correctional settings.The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Salamanca (CEISH).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.