ArticleEcology and evolution2025
Artificial Selection of Early Emerging Helpers in the Cooperatively Breeding Ambrosia Beetle
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Selection of Early Emerging Helpers in the Cooperatively Breeding Ambrosia BeetleEcology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Overlapping generations is a defining characteristic of advanced social life. In cooperative breeding societies, temporary groups of mature offspring are formed that assist in the rearing of additional brood before dispersing and reproducing independently. It is hypothesized that the delayed dispersal period of helpers will determine the number of siblings that can be reared, thus resulting in an indirect fitness gain. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of artificial selection for early dispersal of mature female helpers on the life history, behaviour and fungal symbionts in the ambrosia beetle Xyleborinus saxesenii. Two lineages were bred in the laboratory over the course of five generations, originating from the mixed offspring of two females caught in the wild. In one group, dispersing females were selected at random to initiate the next generation, while in the other group, only early dispersers were selected. A number of life-history traits exhibited a pronounced response in the initial generation. Subsequently, these traits recovered to levels similar to those observed at the beginning of the experiment. Furthermore, significant differences in the fungal community were associated with our selection from the fourth generation onwards. The results suggest that X. saxesenii did not respond to our selection pressure. This may be due to the species' low genetic variability, which is the result of its sib-mating habits, or its high phenotypic plasticity with regard to social behaviour.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.