ArticleCurrent treatment options in psychiatry2021
Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Adolescent Depression.
Article in Current treatment options in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of depression outcomes among university students following brief smartphone-based interventions.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
- Predicting anxiety treatment outcome in community mental health services using linked health administrative data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Why is it so hard to identify (consistent) predictors of treatment outcome in psychotherapy? - clinical and research perspectives.BMC psychology · 2023Review
- Structural and Functional Neural Correlates of Treatment Response for Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depressed Adolescents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose of review: Major Depressive Disorder is a global public health concern that is common in adolescents. Targeting this illness at the early stages of development is critical and could lead to better long-term outcomes because the adolescent brain is highly plastic and, hence, neural systems are likely to be more malleable to interventions. Although a variety of treatments are available, there are currently no guidelines to inform clinicians which intervention might be most suitable for a given youth. Here, we discuss current knowledge of prognostic and prescriptive markers of treatment outcome in adolescent depression, highlight two major limitations of the extant literature and suggest future directions for this important area of research. Recent findings: Despite significant effort, none of the potential demographic (gender, age, race), environmental (parental depression, family functioning) and clinical (severity of depression, comorbid diagnoses, suicidality, hopelessness) predictors have been robustly replicated to warrant implementation in clinical care. Studies on biomarkers that truly reflect pathophysiology are scarce and difficult to draw conclusions from. Summary: More efforts should be directed towards potential neurobiological predictors of treatment outcome. Moreover, rather than evaluating potential predictors in isolation, modern machine learning methods could also be used to build models that combine information across a large array of features and predict treatment outcome for individual patients. These strategies hold promise for advancing personalized healthcare in adolescent depression, which remains a high clinical priority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.