Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122676›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Challenges in diagnostics and treatment of infant-type hemispheric gliomas.

Ludmila Papusha, Margarita Zaytseva, Maria Senchenko, Agnesa Panferova, Agunda Sanakoeva, Anton Artemov, Alexandra Korostyshevskaya, Alexandra Tarakanova, Djamilya Murzaeva, Igor Kasich and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Ludmila PapushaD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Margarita ZaytsevaD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Maria SenchenkoD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Agnesa PanferovaD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Agunda SanakoevaD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Anton ArtemovD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Alexandra KorostyshevskayaInternational Tomography Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Alexandra TarakanovaD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Djamilya MurzaevaPavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Igor KasichD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Artur MerishavyanD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Andrey FlegontovD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina SalnikovaD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Artem ZaychikovRegional Children's Hospital, Yekaterinburg, Russia.
Inna ProleskovskayaRepublican Scientific and Practical Center for Children's Oncology, Hematology and Immunology, Minsk, Belarus.
Yulia DinikinaAlmazov National Medical Research Centre, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Zhanna KumykovaRepublican Children's Clinical Multidisciplinary Center, Nalchik, Russia.
Anastasia ProtsvetkinaD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia UsmanD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander KarachunskiyD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Eugene I HwangBrain Tumor Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Roger J PackerCenter for Neuroscience and Behavioral Medicine, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.
Galina NovichkovaD. Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander DruyResearch Institute of Medical Cell Technologies, Yekaterinburg, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1308-8622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Infant-type hemispheric gliomas (IHG) represent a novel entity, first codified in the WHO CNS 5 classification. Due to their rarity, as well as their neuroimaging and histopathologic heterogeneity, definitive diagnosis can be challenging. In the majority of cases, the tumors are large, and difficult to fully resect. The efficacy of standard cytotoxic chemotherapy remains unclear. IHGs frequently contain receptor tyrosine-kinase (RTK) gene fusions, denoting a potential vulnerability to targeted therapy by small-molecule RTK inhibitors. Methods: We report 15 patients with IHG receiving treatment during a 5-year period. Integrated diagnosis was achieved combining histopathology, DNA methylation profiling and RNA sequencing. Ten out of 15 patients received chemotherapy. Targeted therapy with entrectinib or lorlatinib was prescribed in 5 patients after progression and in 1 as first-line treatment. Results: The median follow-up was 1.5 years (range, 0.1-5.1 years). Six patients were asymptomatic despite large volumes and diagnosed during routine ultrasound screening. Neuroimaging revealed 2 general radiographic presentation, either cystic-solid or purely solid masses. These radiologic subtypes were not associated with differences in histology or clinical behavior, but demonstrated differential gene expression profiles. Standard cytotoxic chemotherapy was administered in 10 patients, in 6 of them disease progression was observed (all with residual tumor). RTK gene fusions were revealed in all cases. Six patients were treated with targeted therapies. All patients had an initial tumor response; following which 2 had disease progression. One-year event-free survival for the entire cohort was 47% (CI 27%-80%), 2-year overall survival was 61% (CI 39%-95%). Conclusions: IHGs are comprised of 2 radiologically and molecularly distinct groups. Huge cystic tumors are frequently associated with life-threating complications. The limited efficacy of the standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and presence of kinase fusion in nearly all cases render patients with IHG candidates for targeted therapies.

Indexed as

entrectinibinfant-type hemispheric gliomaslorlatinibtargeted therapytyrosine-kinase fusions

Identifiers

PMID41122676
PMCPMC12536489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.