Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122673›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

RSK1 and RSK2 modulate the translatome of glioblastoma cells in an isoform-specific and mTORC1 independent manner.

Martín Roffé, Danielle P Nascimento, Paula B Nunes, Luana C Soares, Arielly D H Alves, Ali Hamraghani, Yeganeh Almasi, Zakia Djaoud, Glaucia N M Hajj, Vilma R Martins and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Martín RofféNational Institute of Science and Technology in Oncogenomics and Therapeutic Innovation (INCiTO), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7247-3067
Danielle P NascimentoInternational Research Center (CIPE), A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paula B NunesInternational Research Center (CIPE), A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Luana C SoaresDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics (DPAG), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9127-7061
Arielly D H AlvesHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3570-0827
Ali HamraghaniChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Yeganeh AlmasiDepartment of Biochemistry Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Zakia DjaoudDepartment of Biochemistry Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Glaucia N M HajjInternational Research Center (CIPE), A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2342-7384
Vilma R MartinsDepartment of Cell Biology and Development, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2909-8502
Nahum SonenbergDepartment of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4707-8759
Tommy AlainDepartment of Biochemistry Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0396-9138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The p90 ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) family, downstream target of Ras/ERK signaling, encompasses four human isoforms (RSK1-4). Glioblastomas (GBMs) predominantly express RSK1 and RSK2, whereby RSK1 is markedly upregulated in a subset of GBMs associated with dismal prognosis and immune infiltration, while RSK2 expression is constant. RSKs were proposed as regulators of mRNA translation through the activation of mTORC1 and other factors, such as eIF4B, but nothing is known about their effect on the translatome of GBM cells. Methods: Through the generation of RSK1 and RSK2 knockout as well as double knockout (DKO) GBM cells, we investigated RSK isoform-specific functions in cell signaling, followed by the identification of their distinct transcriptome and translatome. Results: We find that mTORC1 is not activated by RSK isoforms and that eIF4B phosphorylation at S422 is more potently targeted by RSK1 than mTORC1/S6K in GBM cells. Intriguingly, RSK isoforms display differential effects on translation, with RSK1 specifically sustaining translation of a subset of mRNAs upon mTORC1 inhibition. We demonstrate that RSK1 modulates expression in the translatome of mRNAs encoding proteins affecting cell cycle, DNA replication, and repair, while RSK2 impacts mitochondria-related functions. Notably, DKO cells exhibit compounded phenotypes, underscoring the existence of isoform-specific gene regulation. Conclusions: Our findings offer mechanistic insights into the role of RSK in GBMs and provide evidence for a mTORC1-independent and RSK1-dependent translation regulatory program.

Indexed as

glioblastomamRNA translationmTORC1RSKsignaling

Identifiers

PMID41122673
PMCPMC12536492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.