Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122660›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Trends in liver cancer burden in China and G20: a comparative analysis using GBD 2021.

Xiaodi Ma, Lining Jiang, Bing Han, Wenlong Ding, Shaochun Liu, Bing Li, Mingjun Zhang, Senbang Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xiaodi MaHeilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Lining JiangHarbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Bing HanThe Affiliated Qingyuan Hospital (Qingyuan People's Hospital), Guangzhou Medical University, Qingyuan, Guangdong, China.
Wenlong DingYichun Vocational College, Yichun, Heilongjiang, China.
Shaochun LiuHarbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Bing LiHeilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Mingjun ZhangDepartment of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Senbang YaoDepartment of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To compare liver cancer trends and risk factors in China with those in G20 countries (1990-2021) to inform prevention and resource allocation. Methods: GBD 2021 data for liver cancer in China and G20 countries (1990-2021) were analyzed. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR), age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR), and age-standardized disability-adjusted life-years rates (ASDR) were computed using standard population weights. Joinpoint regression estimates the annual percent change (APC; the year-on-year rate of change within each log-linear segment) and the average annual percent change (AAPC; the summary average trend across the entire period). Decomposition analysis partitioned changes into aging, population growth, and epidemiological factors. Trends in ASMR and ASDR attributable to risk factors from 1990 to 2021 in China and G20 countries were assessed. Results: In 2021, the ASIR, ASMR, and ASDR of liver cancer in China were 29.05 (95% UI, 22.42-36.20), 21.51 (95% UI, 16.66-26.61), and 501.26 (95% UI, 387.29-627.98) per 100,000 population, respectively, reflecting a decline compared with 1990. In both 1990 and 2021, G20 countries had substantially lower liver cancer-related deaths than China. Joinpoint regression showed a significant overall decline in APC from 1990 to 2021 in both regions, with a more pronounced decline in China during 2000-2005 than in the G20. Decomposition analysis identified population aging as the primary contributor to ASIR, ASMR, and ASDR in both China and G20 countries. However, epidemiological improvements had a greater impact on reducing ASMR and ASDR in China, whereas population growth was the dominant factor in G20 countries. ASMR and ASDR attributable to high BMI and drug use increased in both settings, and rates attributable to high fasting plasma glucose (FPG) rose steadily, particularly in G20 nations. Conclusion: Although age-standardized liver cancer rates declined in China, the absolute burden rose in both China and G20 countries. Increases in incidence and attributable burden from high BMI, drug use, and high FPG highlight the need for enhanced screening, risk factor control, and targeted prevention.

Indexed as

Chinadisability-adjusted life yearsG20incidenceliver cancermortality

Identifiers

PMID41122660
PMCPMC12536301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.