Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122650›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2025

Perioperative outcomes of multiport or single-port, transperitoneal or retroperitoneal robot assisted radical nephroureterectomy: a narrative review.

Pierre-Etienne Gabriel, Shahrokh F Shariat, Morgan Rouprêt, John P Sfakianos, Evanguelos Xylinas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pierre-Etienne GabrielDepartment of Urology, Bichat Claude-Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique -Hôpitaux de Paris Nord, University Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Morgan RouprêtSorbonne University, groupe recherche clinique (GRC) 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.
John P SfakianosDepartment of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
Evanguelos XylinasDepartment of Urology, Bichat Claude-Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique -Hôpitaux de Paris Nord, University Paris Cité, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RARNU), performed via either a multiport or single-port approach through transperitoneal or retroperitoneal routes, is an increasingly utilized surgical method for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Materials and methods: A collaborative review of the literature available on Medline was conducted to report the perioperative outcomes of multiport or single-port, transperitoneal or retroperitoneal RARNU. A total of 31 references published between 2006 and 2023 were included. Results: The multiport transperitoneal robotic approach has been documented in 23 studies including between 10 and 3774 RARNU. Operative times ranged from 157 to 326 minutes, intraoperative complication rates from 0% to 7.3%, estimated blood loss from 68.9 mL to 380 mL and blood transfusion rates from 1.4% to 22.7%. Overall postoperative complication ranged from 11.9% to 43.8%, with major complications occurring in 0% to 15.1% of cases. Additionally, the length of hospital stay ranged from 2.3 to 10.3 days. The single-port transperitoneal robotic approach has been documented in 3 studies including between 1 and 12 RANU. Operative time ranged from 160 to 240 minutes, with 17% of patients requiring transfusions. The length of stay varied between 3 and 7 days. Finally, five retrospective studies, including between 2 and 12 patients treated with multiport retroperitoneal RARNU and between 2 and 20 patients with single-port retroperitoneal RARNU were reported, also with satisfactory results. Conclusion: Although prospective comparative studies are needed to confirm these results, RARNU approach, whether single-port or multi-port, transperitoneal or retroperitoneal, appears promising and safe.

Indexed as

multiportretroperitonealrobot assisted radical nephroureterectomysingle-porttransperitoneal

Identifiers

PMID41122650
PMCPMC12535875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.