ArticleCureus2025
Management of Benign Findings Following Local Anesthetic Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: A Single-Center Review and Comparison With Current Guidelines.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Although local anesthetic transperineal (LATP) prostate biopsy is now widely adopted, evidence remains limited, and no clear consensus exists on the optimal follow-up strategy for men with benign histology. This gap is particularly important given the increasing preference for LATP over the transrectal approach and the substantial proportion of patients who receive benign biopsy results. This study evaluated the follow-up of benign LATP biopsy findings and compared them with current international guidelines. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted at Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust on patients who underwent LATP biopsy between November 2023 and April 2024. Patients with benign histology were identified and categorized by follow-up strategy: monitored, discharged to primary care, underwent repeat biopsy, or unclear. Outcomes of repeat biopsies and associated clinical parameters were assessed. Results Of 616 patients, 206 (33.4%) had benign histology. Sixteen patients underwent repeat biopsy due to clinical or radiological suspicion. Among those re-biopsied, six (37.5%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer, including 2 (12.5%) with clinically significant disease (Gleason Grade Group ≥2). Immediate repeat biopsy detected cancer in 50% of cases, particularly in patients with inadequate initial sampling or Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 5 lesions. Complication rates were low across the cohort, although three patients developed urosepsis. Conclusions LATP biopsy is safe and effective, but benign findings warrant structured follow-up due to a measurable false-negative rate. Our experience supports guideline recommendations that emphasize multidisciplinary evaluation, prostate-specific antigen kinetics, and imaging. Vigilant monitoring reduces the risk of missed cancers while avoiding unnecessary procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.