ArticleCureus2025
Administration of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec in an Infant With Spinal Muscular Atrophy and PCR-Confirmed SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) is used to treat spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), and early treatment is critical. However, OA administration may trigger an immune response. To date, no studies have established the optimal timing for OA administration following SARS-CoV-2 infection. We report the case of an eight-month-old female infant presenting with delayed motor development who was diagnosed with SMA. OA therapy was initially prescribed but postponed because of a risk of COVID-19 exposure; the patient's mother had recently developed COVID-19. Despite testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, the infant remained asymptomatic, and her viral load did not increase. OA was administered 19 days after the mother's COVID-19 diagnosis. The patient did not develop COVID-19 and experienced no significant adverse effects. This case suggests that OA administration may be safe in asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with low viral loads, allowing timely therapy to preserve motor function. Further studies are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for the optimal timing of OA administration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.