ArticleCureus2025
Assessment of Acellular Dermal Matrix-Associated Complications With Silicone Implants.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is defined as an allograft composed of sterile, decellularized, regenerative dermal tissue matrix for soft tissue reconstructive and transplantation purposes. The epidermal layer is removed from the dermal layer to minimize immunological response in the ADM recipient. The idea of using ADM is to improve breast reconstruction and promote faster recovery with fewer complications. It is expected that ADM will reduce capsular contracture, the most frequent complication of silicone implant surgeries. However, some complications have been related to ADM in breast reconstructive surgeries. In such cases, imaging scans, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography (USG), can aid in diagnosing and monitoring complications. In this case series, we share our experience regarding ADM complications in our clinical practice. We showed the most common complications of ADM associated with breast implants in eight patients referred to USG, MRI, mammography, and computed tomography. The more frequent findings were capsular contracture, folded ADM, intracapsular collection, and pericapsular impairment. We also divided the findings into early and late complications. ADM and its complications associated with breast implants can be diagnosed and followed up with breast imaging scans. Knowledge of ADM presentation and its complications is imperative for diagnostic purposes, managing, and following up patients who undergo these procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.