ArticleCureus2025
CT Head Imaging Within 60 Minutes of Arrival at the ED: A Clinical Audit.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This audit aimed to assess current compliance with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) NG232 guideline and evaluate the impact of introducing a triage pro forma to nurses to improve the time from patients' arrival in the Emergency Department (ED) to CT head imaging in eligible patients. Method A retrospective clinical audit was conducted over two cycles at the ED of a UK District General Hospital. It included patients at the ED who underwent CT head imaging. Non-trauma-related indications and patients under the age of 16 years were excluded. The first cycle, using Electronic Patient Records (EPR), reviewed 138 patients from 20 September 2023 to 20 October 2023. A pro forma was then introduced to assist triage nurses in identifying eligible patients, ensuring they were promptly assessed by a clinician, and imaging was requested. Daily educational sessions were conducted from 20 October 2023 to 3 November 2023, along with email dissemination and handover reinforcement. The second cycle was conducted from 3 November 2023 to 15 November 2023 and included 87 patients, with their data collected from EPR. Results In the first cycle, 4.34% (n=6) of patients received imaging within 60 minutes, which is suboptimal. In the second cycle, the proportion of imaging completed within 60 minutes increased to 6.9% (n=6), and this incremental increase is significant (p <0.05). Conclusion The introduction of the triage pro forma resulted in incremental improvements in timely brain imaging, and, therefore, the intervention showed significant positive potential in enhancing adherence to national guidelines and improving patient outcomes. Challenges such as staff compliance, patient transfer time, and workload do influence this, and those are areas that need further improvement. This project has the potential to be implemented across multiple trusts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.