ArticleCureus2025
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Managed With Lumboperitoneal Shunting and Venous Sinus Stenting: A Report of Two Cases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a relatively rare disease of unknown pathogenesis initially managed by conservative medical treatment. For intractable cases, there is a trend toward endovascular venous sinus stenting (VSS) over traditional CSF diversion by surgical shunting. However, currently, there is no clear consensus regarding the selection of the surgical approach. We describe two cases of IIH in young women, each presenting with severe headache and visual disturbances, both resistant to initial medical therapy, and both found to have different patterns of transverse sinus stenosis. The first patient was a 33-year-old woman who underwent lumboperitoneal shunt surgery for treatment of venous stenosis suspected to be caused secondarily by extrinsic compression from raised intracranial pressure, while the second patient was a 23-year-old woman who was treated by endovascular sinus stenting for a suspected intrinsic form of venous stenosis. Each patient resulted in complete symptom resolution after two years of follow-up. Based on the findings and analysis of these two representative cases, distinguishing the form of venous sinus stenosis may be helpful in the selection of a surgical approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.