Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122547›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Managed With Lumboperitoneal Shunting and Venous Sinus Stenting: A Report of Two Cases.

Yujiro Matsushima, Masato Saito, Takehiro Saga, Hajime Wada, Adam Tucker, Masao Sato, Manabu Kinoshita

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yujiro MatsushimaNeurological Surgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, JPN.
Masato SaitoNeurosurgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, JPN.
Takehiro SagaNeurological Surgery, Hakodate Shintoshi Hospital, Hakodate, JPN.
Hajime WadaNeurological Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Asahikawa Hospital, Asahikawa, JPN.
Adam TuckerNeurological Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Kitami Hospital, Kitami, JPN.
Masao SatoNeurological Surgery, Sapporo Higashi Tokushukai Hospital, Sapporo, JPN.
Manabu KinoshitaNeurosurgery, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a relatively rare disease of unknown pathogenesis initially managed by conservative medical treatment. For intractable cases, there is a trend toward endovascular venous sinus stenting (VSS) over traditional CSF diversion by surgical shunting. However, currently, there is no clear consensus regarding the selection of the surgical approach. We describe two cases of IIH in young women, each presenting with severe headache and visual disturbances, both resistant to initial medical therapy, and both found to have different patterns of transverse sinus stenosis. The first patient was a 33-year-old woman who underwent lumboperitoneal shunt surgery for treatment of venous stenosis suspected to be caused secondarily by extrinsic compression from raised intracranial pressure, while the second patient was a 23-year-old woman who was treated by endovascular sinus stenting for a suspected intrinsic form of venous stenosis. Each patient resulted in complete symptom resolution after two years of follow-up. Based on the findings and analysis of these two representative cases, distinguishing the form of venous sinus stenosis may be helpful in the selection of a surgical approach.

Indexed as

cerebral venous sinus stenosisidiopathic intracranial hypertension (iih)lumboperitoneal (lp) shunttransverse sinus stenosisvenous sinus stenting (vss)

Identifiers

PMID41122547
PMCPMC12536328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.