ReviewCureus2025
Surgery to Strength: A Literature Review of Postoperative Rehabilitation for Hindfoot Surgeries.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Calcaneal osteotomy, subtalar fusion, and triple fusion are the main surgical interventions used to correct foot deformities, reduce pain, and restore functionality in arthritis, flatfoot deformity, and post-traumatic complications. The outcomes of these surgical interventions are dependent on careful surgical planning, postoperative patient compliance, and comprehensive multidisciplinary management. Rehabilitation generally follows a stepwise approach, starting with non-weight-bearing and partial weight-bearing and ending with targeted physiotherapy. This will enhance mobility and strength and minimize complications such as muscle atrophy and joint stiffness. Patient compliance is critical to achieve adequate results as it greatly influences bone healing and leads to better functional recovery. Patient demographics and comorbidities and specific surgical techniques often influence rehabilitation approaches and need individualized tailored treatment plans. This review presents updated evidence and recommends a standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol for these three surgical techniques. Additionally, it will discuss the variations between different protocols in clinical practice, highlight the causes of those differences, and propose recommendations for future research. Recently, it has become increasingly clear that there is a lack of consistent, high-quality evidence to guide postoperative rehabilitation after hindfoot surgery. This highlights the growing need for large-scale research to define postoperative protocols, weight-bearing guidelines, and advanced therapeutic modalities. Establishing evidence-based, broadly accepted guidelines could significantly enhance healing outcomes, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction in foot surgery rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.