ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Effective strategies for cultivating rapid response, team collaboration, and stress resistance in emergency standardized training nurses during real rescue.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Building Resilience in Emergency Care Teams: A Narrative Review of Team-Based and Organisational Strategies for Nurses and Allied Health Professionals.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/purpose: Standardized training for emergency nurses should include effective methods to develop rapid response, teamwork, and stress resistance. Traditional simulation-based training may lack the intensity and unpredictability of real emergencies. This study evaluated a progressive real rescue participation strategy compared to traditional simulation training. Methods: A retrospective analysis included 235 emergency standardized training nurses from May 2022 to April 2025. They were divided into a Traditional Training group ( Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable. Both groups improved significantly on all post-training scales. However, the Real Rescue group showed significantly greater improvement than the Traditional group in all dimensions of rapid response (TDMI subscales, all Conclusion: Real-rescue training is more effective than traditional methods in improving emergency nurses' critical skills and psychological resilience. This approach should be integrated into standardized training programs to better prepare nurses for real-world emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.