ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2025
Influence of electronic cigarette vapour on the
Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Color stability of different aligner attachment composites following exposure to conventional and electronic cigarette smoke.Odontology · 2026Article
- Effect of Flavored, Blond, and Filterless Cigarette Smoke on the Color Stability and Surface Roughness of a Nanohybrid Resin Composite: An in vitro Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the chromatic differences (ΔE) of three nanohybrid composite resins (Filtek™ Z350 XT, FORMA™ and Palfique LX5) after increasing exposures (0, 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,250 and 1,500 puffs) to e-cigarette vapours. Materials and methods: The study was conducted with an Results: Filtek™ Z350 XT resin had an average ΔE value of 3.239 ± 1.30; FORMA™ showed an ΔE value of 4.737 ± 1.672, and Palfique LX5 had a mean ΔE of 1.614 ± 0.867. Significant differences were found between resin brands ( Conclusion: Chromatic stability of composites after exposure to e-cigarette vapours varied depending on the material brand, with FORMA™ resin showing clinically unacceptable chromatic differences, whereas Filtek™ Z350 XT and Palfique LX5 resins showed clinically acceptable chromatic differences, with the latter showing greater resistance to colour change and therefore greater chromatic stability. These findings serve as a guide in decision-making relative to the selection of restorative materials indicated for patients with vaping habits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.