ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology
Treatment of aggressive prostate cancer with triptorelin in real life in France: the TALISMAN study.
Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04593420 (Treatment of Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Real Life), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of Aggressive Prostate Cancer in Real Life: Initiation, Schedule and Management of Triptorelin Treatment.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data on modalities of real-world use of androgen deprivation therapy, such as triptorelin, in men with prostate cancer (PCa) are lacking. Objectives: To describe the real-world management of triptorelin treatment over 12 months following treatment initiation in France, and to gain a better understanding of the choices being made about planned total treatment duration, formulation, and route of administration. Design: TALISMAN was a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal, non-interventional study. Methods: Patients with PCa eligible for triptorelin treatment for at least 12 months were enrolled and followed up for 12 months. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of patients treated continuously with triptorelin during the 12 months following treatment initiation. Planned total duration of treatment, formulation, administration route, and reasons for these choices were evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Quality-of-life and safety data were collected. Results: Overall, 806 patients were enrolled, of whom 787 patients were included in the analysis. Mean (standard deviation) age was 74.0 (7.9) years, the main circumstance of prescription of triptorelin was a high-risk localized tumor (41.1%). Planned total duration of treatment at baseline was most commonly 24-36 months, and the main reasons for the choice of duration were Gleason score and guideline recommendations. Most patients (72.5%) received the 3-month subcutaneous formulation at baseline; main reasons for choice of formulation and route were physician preference and planned total duration of treatment. Overall, 85.3% (95% confidence interval (82.6, 87.7)) of patients received a continuous 12-month treatment with triptorelin, and 69.1% of patients undertook at least one supportive care pathway during the study period. Patients reported an increase in hormonal treatment-related symptoms and worsening of sexual activity and functioning. There were no new or unexpected safety findings. Conclusion: In France, compliance with continuous triptorelin treatment for 12 months is high and prescribing aligns with guideline recommendations. Trial registration: NCT04593420.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.