ArticleJournal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering
Effect of an exosuit on kinematics in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury.
Article in Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of an exosuit on daily life gait performance in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anti-gravity exosuits supporting hip and knee extension have emerged for overground training. This study investigated their effect on kinematics in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) compared to regular walking and to walking with an overground BWS system. Methods: Fourteen individuals with iSCI were tested during overground walking in three conditions: regular, exosuit, and BWS. Kinematics were assessed using the Xsens MVN motion capture system. Results: Maximum hip extension was larger for exosuit compared to regular walking (Δ4.7°, 95% CI [1.4, 7.9]), but was not different compared to BWS. Mean knee flexion was smaller for exosuit compared to regular walking (Δ-1.7°, 95% CI [-3.0, -0.4]) and compared to BWS (Δ-3.5°, 95% CI [-5.4, -1.6]). Most secondary outcome measures (e.g. walking speed, stride length, step width, ML COM excursion) showed no differences between exosuit and regular walking. Comparing exosuit to BWS, most secondary outcome measures (e.g., walking speed, stride length, stride time, trunk inclination) favored BWS. Conclusions: An anti-gravity exosuit resulted in increased hip and knee extension, but did not translate into other gait improvements. Given the more favorable outcomes of the BWS system compared to the exosuit, exosuit design improvements are needed to be effectively implemented in gait rehabilitation after iSCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.