Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122427›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Impact of artificial intelligence-based digital smile design on patient and clinician satisfaction and facial esthetic outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ravinder S Saini, Kanwalpreet Kaur, Vishwanath Gurumurthy, Rayan Ibrahim H Binduhayyim, Ashish Kaushik, Mohamed Saheer Kuruniyan, Mario Alberto Alarcón-Sánchez, Artak Heboyan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ravinder S SainiDepartment of Allied Dental Health Sciences COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Kanwalpreet KaurRutgers School of Dental Medicine, Newark, NJ, USA.
Vishwanath GurumurthyDepartment of Allied Dental Health Sciences COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Rayan Ibrahim H BinduhayyimDepartment of Allied Dental Health Sciences COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Ashish KaushikMechanical Engineering Department, Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary University, Gurugram, India.
Mohamed Saheer KuruniyanDepartment of Allied Dental Health Sciences COAMS, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.
Mario Alberto Alarcón-SánchezMolecular Biology in Medicine Program, University Center of Health Sciences, University of Guadalajara (CUCS-UdeG), Guadalajara, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-7969
Artak HeboyanDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Stomatology, Yerevan State Medical University after Mkhitar Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-3205

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the influence of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated Digital Smile Design (DSD) on patients and clinician satisfaction, and overall aesthetic outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify studies (2004-2024) evaluating AI-based DSD. Eligible studies reported patient/clinician satisfaction or facial esthetic outcomes. Data were extracted on study characteristics, participant demographics, DSD type, and outcome measures. A meta-analysis of satisfaction prevalence was performed using Jamovi with a random-effects model. Methodological quality was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, and publication bias was evaluated via rank correlation, fail-safe N, and regression tests for funnel plot asymmetry. Results: Seven studies were included after screening 387 records. AI-based tools (e.g. SmileCloud, REBEL, and Invisalign SmileView) improved esthetic outcomes, enhancing smile symmetry, lip arcs, and incisal edge visibility. Key predictors of success included philtrum height and buccal corridor. The meta-analysis showed a pooled satisfaction prevalence of 58% (95% CI: 0.30-0.86, Conclusion: These findings suggest that AI-generated DSD provides significant facial esthetic outcomes. However, future studies should explore the long-term sustainability of these outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of AI-based dental treatments.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencedental aestheticsdigital smile designfacial estheticsmachine learningsmile simulation

Identifiers

PMID41122427
PMCPMC12536214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.