Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122378›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Generalised machine learning models outperform personalised models for cognitive load classification in real-life settings.

Christoph Anders, Ipsita Bhaduri, Bert Arnrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christoph AndersDigital Health - Connected Healthcare, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Ipsita BhaduriDigital Health - Connected Healthcare, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Bert ArnrichDigital Health - Connected Healthcare, Hasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: By issuing work-break reminders, for example, personal assistants for cognitive load could be beneficial in maintaining health and life satisfaction in society. Wearable sensors facilitate the necessary real-time collection of physiological data. Still, publicly available real-life data sets obtained with wearable sensors are scarce, especially considering multi-modal recordings. Furthermore, data is usually recorded in either completely Methods: This work collected data from ten university students during given and self-chosen cognitive load tasks, resembling typical working environments from over 40% of the OECD population, and investigated if commercially available sensors suffice for building cognitive load assistants. The study design accounted for a balanced distribution of eight working hours per participant, split between Results: Across participants, no single feature correlated significantly with cognitive load, but differences in smartwatch indices and biomarkers were identified between low- and high-load scenarios. Generalised machine learning models like Logistic Regression achieved F1 scores of up to 0.91, 0.77, and 0.54 for two, three, and five-class classification, respectively. Discussion: The presented study design marks a step towards real-life mental state assistants, and the anonymised dataset was made publicly available.

Indexed as

cognitive load experimentshuman-centered computingmachine learningpersonal assistanttime-series classificationuncontrolled environmentwavelet decompositionwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID41122378
PMCPMC12536347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.