Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122369›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Tattoo Removal in Forensic Mental Health Settings: A Case for Advocacy.

Nandini Mishra, Priya Khalsa, Achal Mishra

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nandini MishraMedicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, GBR.
Priya KhalsaPsychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, CAN.
Achal MishraForensic Psychiatry, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, CAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The significance of visible tattoos in psychiatric patients should be explored with them. This can reveal important information about their psychological well-being. Facial tattoos can impact the individual's appearance and self-esteem, especially if the tattoo(s) were acquired during an episode of mental illness. It serves as a constant reminder of the time when the person was unwell and can hinder progress and rehabilitation. Removal of such tattoo(s) can aid in the recovery of these patients. While tattoo removal services are available, patients with chronic and severe mental health problems often lack the funds for tattoo removal. Similarly, patients within forensic mental health settings may have additional restrictions on their movement, which serve as a barrier to accessing treatment. We would like to discuss the case of a young male patient who is undergoing tattoo removal with significant improvement in self-esteem and call for advocacy in this regard.

Indexed as

advocacymental healthself-esteemstigmatattoo removal

Identifiers

PMID41122369
PMCPMC12536925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.