Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122349›Full record

ArticleForensic sciences research2025

Types and distribution of the friction ridge patterns on the ball area of the bare footprint.

Li Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic sciences research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Li LiuDepartment of Forensic Science & Technology, National Police University of China, Shenyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The comparison of footprints to establish positive identification of individuals is an accepted practice. Due to the poor clarity and limited quantity of friction ridge skin detail in the bare footprint at crime scenes, it can prove challenging and problematic to locate the part of the foot that made the print. The aim of the present study is to analyse the types and its distributions of patterns in the ball area of the footprint. The samples comprise 1 460 adults. Results show that loops, whorls, and arches have been found in the ball area of the footprint. In the inner zone, loops are 65.51% of all the patterns, in which vertical loop-down is the most common pattern. In the mid zone, 54.04% of the samples only have vertical loop-down as the single pattern, and 7.71% show multiple patterns, with particularly nine types of multiple patterns found. In the outer zone, patterns are very rare. Only 5.45% of the samples have horizontal loop-outer, and 0.27% of the samples are vertical loop-down. Different patterns in the ball area of the foot show different frequencies of appearance. The shapes of patterns are different in each area of the foot. The examination of the patterns in the bare footprint could be a possibility of locating a certain position of the origin foot.

Indexed as

ball areabare footprintforensic sciencesfrequency of patternfriction ridge

Identifiers

PMID41122349
PMCPMC12536876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.