ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2025
Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance in Endodontically Treated Molars Using Lithium Disilicate and Composite Overlays Versus Endocrowns.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Statement of Problem: Restoring extensively damaged, endodontically treated molars with an indirect restoration that both preserves and protects the remaining tooth structure is a significant challenge. Overlays and endocrowns offer a less invasive alternative compared to conventional crowns. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance and fracture patterns of molars restored with different materials and designs. Materials and Methods: This study involved 40 extracted human molars, which underwent endodontic root canal treatment and were divided into four groups: composite core build-up with pressed lithium disilicate overlay (OL) ( Results: The findings suggest that while the material type may not significantly impact fracture resistance or catastrophic fracture likelihood, the type of restoration (endocrown vs., overlay) is a crucial factor to consider. Conclusions: Clinicians should weigh the higher risk of catastrophic fractures associated with endocrowns when selecting restorative options for endodontically treated teeth. Clinical Implications: Overlays and endocrowns offer similar overall tooth fracture resistance, making both viable options for restoring endodontically treated molars. However, OLs may better withstand chewing forces and posed no risk of catastrophic tooth fractures, unlike ECs, which carry a higher tooth fracture risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.