Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122302›Full record

ArticleJAMIA open2025

Electronic health record activity changes around new decision support implementation: monitoring using audit logs and topic modeling.

Jinying Chen, Sarah L Cutrona, Ajay Dharod, Adam Moses, Aaron Bridges, Brian Ostasiewski, Kristie L Foley, Thomas K Houston, iDAPT (Implementation & Informatics Developing Adaptable Processes and Technologies for Cancer Control) Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMIA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jinying ChenDepartment of Medicine/Section of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7259-4301
Sarah L CutronaDepartment of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4795-8377
Ajay DharodDepartment of Internal Medicine/Section of General Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8033-9009
Adam MosesWake Forest Center for Healthcare Innovation, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2782-5080
Aaron BridgesClinical & Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7320-8369
Brian OstasiewskiClinical & Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0054-0192
Kristie L FoleyDepartment of Implementation Science, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3759-4581
Thomas K HoustonDepartment of Internal Medicine/Section of General Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC 27101, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2909-4018
iDAPT (Implementation & Informatics Developing Adaptable Processes and Technologies for Cancer Control) Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control

Funding

CTSA UM1 Program at Wake ForestUM1TR004929 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Jamy D Ard, KRISTIE L FOLEY · 2024 to 2026
$11.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and test a novel machine learning approach for monitoring impact of computerized clinical decision support (CDS) tools on clinicians' electronic health record (EHR) activities. Materials and Methods: Our CDS monitoring approach leverages topic modeling, a latent-variable statistical machine learning method, to infer health providers' EHR activities from EHR audit logs. We applied this approach to monitor the impact of a tobacco cessation support CDS tool newly implemented in 5 cancer clinics (2018-2021). We trained the topic model on EHR audit log data from 3445 encounters (pre-CDS-implementation: 1734, post-CDS-implementation: 1711) for patients with active smoking status. The number of topics was automatically determined based on within-topic coherence and across-topic divergence, and the identified topics were assigned clinically relevant EHR activity labels by 4 domain experts. Results: The topic model identified 2 distinct activities focusing on CDS (act on CDS, bypass/postpone CDS), 2 activities related to CDS (review patient records and address alerts, use note templates and acknowledge the completion of CDS), 6 related to accessing (access patient station) and reviewing patient data (external records, synopsis data, snapshot of patient data, problem list/diagnosis/notes, treatment plan), and 4 related to modifying EHR (modify diagnosis/problem lists, document visit with record review, perform administrative activities for visit and billing, and document follow-up care plan). Comparing matched 1-hour after-check-in windows post-implementation (n = 841) versus pre-implementation (n = 841) of CDS, the mean prevalence (expressed as proportions out of 1.0) of providers' EHR-use activity increased on CDS-focused activities (0.073, 95% CI, 0.066-0.079) and CDS-related activities (0.098, 95% CI, 0.089-0.106) and decreased on modifying EHR (-0.113, 95% CI, -0.124 to -0.102) and reviewing patient data (-0.058, 95% CI, -0.072 to -0.044). Discussion: Our topic model-based CDS monitoring approach can identify shifts in prevalence of EHR-use activities pre-implementation versus post-implementation. This approach can be applied to detect unintended changes in EHR activities on a large population scale following CDS implementation, providing valuable insights to guide focused qualitative investigations for CDS improvement or de-implementation. Conclusion: Our approach offers a scalable, data-driven framework for evaluating the real-world impact of EHR-embedded CDS tools. Built on a generic machine learning framework, this approach could be adapted to explore impact of other healthcare quality improvement strategies using EHR-integrated CDS interventions.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportEHR audit logselectronic alertsmonitoringtopic model

Identifiers

PMID41122302
PMCPMC12536917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.