ArticleStem cells international2025
Mapping the Landscape of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles: From Bench to Bedside.
Article in Stem cells international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, have garnered significant attention for their therapeutic potential in regenerative medicine and inflammatory disease management. This bibliometric analysis maps the global research landscape of MSC-derived EV studies from 2014 to 2025, utilizing data from Web of Science (WoS), Scopus, and PubMed. A total of 99 research articles were analyzed after screening 335 initial records, focusing on publication trends, citation metrics, collaboration networks, and thematic evolution. The field exhibited a 27.11% annual publication growth rate, with 841 authors contributing to 70 journals, reflecting its interdisciplinary and collaborative nature. Key findings include a surge in publications from 2018 onward, driven by clinical trials targeting conditions such as COVID-19, osteoarthritis, and spinal cord injury. The United States and China led international collaborations, with 22.68% of publications involving cross-border co-authorships. Keyword analysis revealed a shift from foundational terms like "exosomes" to clinical applications like "immunomodulation" and "osteoarthritis." Despite the field's promise, limitations such as partial 2025 data and exclusion of non-English studies suggest areas for broader inclusion. This study underscores the rapid growth and clinical potential of MSC-derived EV research, providing insights for researchers and policymakers to advance therapeutic development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.