ArticleElectronics2025
A Markov Chain Replacement Strategy for Surrogate Identifiers: Minimizing Re-Identification Risk While Preserving Text Reuse.
Article in Electronics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
"Hiding in Plain Sight" (HIPS) strategies for Personal Health Information (PHI) replace PHI with surrogate values to hinder re-identification attempts. We evaluate three different HIPS strategies for PHI replacement, a standard Consistent replacement strategy, a Random replacement strategy, and a novel Markov model strategy. We evaluate the privacy-preserving benefits and relative utility for information extraction of these strategies on both a simulated PHI distribution and real clinical corpora from two different institutions using a range of false negative error rates (FNER). The Markov strategy consistently outperformed the Consistent and Random substitution strategies on both real data and in statistical simulations. Using FNER ranging from 0.1% to 5%, PHI leakage at the document level could be reduced from 27.1% to 0.1% and from 94.2% to 57.7% with the Markov strategy versus the standard Consistent substitution strategy, at 0.1% and 0.5% FNER, respectively. Additionally, we assessed the generated corpora containing synthetic PHI for reuse using a variety of information extraction methods. Results indicate that modern deep learning methods have similar performance on all strategies, but older machine learning techniques can suffer from the change in context. Overall, a Markov surrogate generation strategy substantially reduces the chance of inadvertent PHI release.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.