Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122291›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Workplace precrastination: conceptualization and scale development.

Jie Guo, Inchul Cho, Sushil Nifadkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie GuoManagement and Information System Department, University of North Georgia, Oakwood, GA, United States.
Inchul ChoManagement and Information System Department, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, GA, United States.
Sushil NifadkarManagement and Information System Department, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, GA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workplace precrastination is the phenomenon wherein individuals tend to rush task-related activities at work and complete them as soon as possible. Due to its prevalence in everyday life (e.g., answering emails quickly, finishing work rapidly), precrastination has received increasing media and scholarly attention. However, despite growing interest in the topic, no psychometrically sound measure exists to capture workplace precrastination in organizations. We define workplace precrastination as the tendency of employees to complete an official task sooner than the expected deadline. This tendency manifests in three distinct dimensions: (1) immediate start, (2) rapid progress, and (3) early completion. Using three samples and a multi-wave approach to data collection, we develop a new scale to measure workplace precrastination and test its construct validity. We also examine whether precrastination is conceptually and empirically distinct from procrastination. Our findings suggest that workplace precrastination is distinct from procrastination and that it contributes unique variance to several organizationally relevant behavioral and attitudinal constructs.

Indexed as

attitudemotivationperformanceprecrastinationprocrastinationscale development

Identifiers

PMID41122291
PMCPMC12535967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.