ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025
Associations Between Graft Choice and Return to Sports After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction in Athletes.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bone Defect Regeneration and Donor-Site Morbidity After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Current concepts and future perspective of muscle function tests to inform return to sport decision-making after ACLR: A narrative review.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries commonly occur in athletes, and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) after ACL injury can predictably allow athletes to return to sports (RTS). However, the time to RTS can be variable and dependent on a variety of patient and surgical factors. Purpose: To evaluate the associations between hamstring tendon (HT), quadriceps tendon (QT), and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft choice and RTS data for athletes after primary ACLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Recreational and competitive athletes aged between 13 and 24 years, undergoing primary ACLR at an academic tertiary institution located in the central United States from 2010 to 2022, were included in the study. RTS outcome variables, including time from procedure to RTS clearance, return to previous level, return to competition, and reinjury (ACL retear and meniscus tear), if found to be significantly associated with autograft type, were subsequently assessed using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with Bonferroni correction and logistic regression, with the HT autograft as the reference, to investigate the relationship between different autograft types and patients' recovery and clearance status. Graft failure was based on clinical history of reinjury, physical examination, magnetic resonance imaging, and/or revision surgery. Results: A total of 200 patients who had ACLR were included in this study. Athletes with hamstring tendon autografts were cleared at 25.4 weeks postoperatively, while those treated with BPTB and QT autografts were cleared at 41.1 and 37.6 weeks, respectively ( Conclusion: HT autograft patients, on average, were cleared sooner and more likely to suffer an ACL graft tear compared with BPTB or QT patients. However, all 3 graft choices demonstrated similar RTS rates. This study is important for shared decision-making between orthopaedic surgeons and athletes when determining the optimal, patient-specific graft for ACLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.