ArticleJournal of surgical case reports2025
Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement using a bioprosthesis in a young adult with Wunderlich syndrome and bicuspid aortic valve.
Article in Journal of surgical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the case of a 20-year-old male with a history of Wunderlich syndrome and prior partial nephrectomy, who was referred for cardiovascular surgery evaluation due to severe aortic regurgitation. Transthoracic echocardiography revealed bicuspid aortic valve type 1 with right-left cusp fusion and cusp prolapse, preserved left ventricular function (LVEF 55%), and marked left chamber enlargement. Given the patient's history of major bleeding, a mechanical prosthesis was contraindicated. He underwent minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through upper mini-sternotomy with implantation of an Inspiris Resilia® #25 bioprosthesis and aortic reconstruction with pericardial patch. The postoperative course was uneventful, with adequate hemodynamic stability, no major complications, and early discharge. This case highlights the importance of individualized prosthesis selection in young patients with contraindication to anticoagulation, and the role of minimally invasive approaches in reducing morbidity and hospital stay while enabling future Valve-in-Valve strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.