ArticleFarmaceuticos comunitarios2025
[Creation of Patient Profiles and a Screening Tool for Individuals with Pain].
Article in Farmaceuticos comunitarios, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic pain, affecting 20-26% of adults, has a profound impact on quality of life and generates substantial socioeconomic costs. Patient profiling enables the individualization of treatment, the identification of patient subgroups, and the design of personalized therapeutic strategies, ultimately improving outcomes and healthcare efficiency. The main objective of this study is to establish patient clusters based on pain characteristics and to develop a screening tool capable of identifying patients according to the resulting clustering model. Materials and Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study was conducted in patients experiencing pain who visited community pharmacies. Unsupervised clustering techniques were employed to identify patterns among patients with acute and chronic pain. These were followed by statistical analyses and supervised algorithms for the prediction and evaluation of the questionnaire. Based on these findings, a tool was developed to predict patient group membership according to the identified clusters. Results: The analysis identified four acute pain profiles and five chronic pain profiles, with subgroup 1 exhibiting the poorest outcomes in both cases. The classification model used to predict new data achieved an accuracy of 64.52% for acute pain and 85.56% for chronic pain based on the available data. Conclusions: Four patient profiles were identified in acute pain and five in chronic pain, facilitating the personalization of treatment. Community pharmacy, due to its accessibility, enables continuous follow-up, improves adherence, allows for treatment adjustments, and enhances coordination of care. The classification tool will enable patient assessment through psychometric variables, thereby improving pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.