Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41122173›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2025

Neuroinflammation: targeting microglia for neuroprotection and repair after spinal cord injury.

Roberta Ramos Cavalcanti, Fernanda Martins Almeida, Ana Maria Blanco Martinez, Camila Marques Freria

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Danshen (Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roberta Ramos CavalcantiPathological Anatomy Program at Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fernanda Martins AlmeidaPathological Anatomy Program at Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ana Maria Blanco MartinezPathological Anatomy Program at Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Camila Marques FreriaCenter for Neural Repair, Dept. of Neurosciences, University of California - San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroinflammation is a tightly regulated process essential for central nervous system (CNS) homeostasis, debris clearance, and defense against pathogens. Microglia, the resident immune cells of the CNS, are central to this response, supporting plasticity and repair under normal conditions. Following spinal cord injury (SCI), however, this response becomes amplified and dysregulated. Early microglial activation can be protective, but prolonged activation drives the release of pro-inflammatory and cytotoxic mediators that exacerbate secondary injury and hinder repair. Microglia also engage in complex crosstalk with astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, neurons, and infiltrating immune cells, orchestrating both protective and damaging processes. This dual and dynamic nature underscores their importance as both targets and modulators in SCI therapies. This review aims to examine the roles of microglia in SCI, summarizes SCI pathology, the specific roles of microglia and macrophages, and outlines translational efforts to modulate their activation, while also highlighting the barriers to clinical application. Evidence from preclinical studies and emerging therapeutic strategies, including pharmacological, cell-based, and exosome-based interventions, demonstrates the potential to reduce harmful inflammation, promote neuroprotection, and support functional recovery. Despite these advances, clinical translation remains limited, constrained by the heterogeneity of microglial responses, narrow therapeutic windows, and patient-specific variability. These challenges often lead to modest or inconsistent clinical outcomes. Future strategies will require precision, multi-targeted approaches that integrate microglial modulation with the preservation of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the regulation of peripheral immune infiltration. Harnessing the regenerative potential of microglia, guided by biomarker-based patient stratification and a deeper understanding of their dynamic roles, offers the most promising path toward meaningful recovery after SCI.

Indexed as

MicrogliaNeuroinflammatory DiseasesNeuroprotectionSpinal Cord InjuriesAnimalsHumansblood brain barriermacrophagesmicroglianeuroinflammationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID41122173
PMCPMC12535890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.