ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2025
Adequacy of Gross Anatomy Knowledge among the Orthopedic Residents: An Interdisciplinary Educational Research.
Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We evaluated the adequacy of gross anatomical knowledge of the upper and lower limbs among 20 orthopedic residents and two groups of undergraduate medical students in the Department of Orthopedics. Methods: Twenty orthopedic residents completed a review course on the gross anatomy of the upper and lower limbs, delivered by the Department of Anatomy. Two quizzes were administered to the orthopedic residents and to two groups of undergraduate medical students. The first quiz, consisting of 42 questions, assessed the knowledge of upper limb gross anatomy among the residents and 22 undergraduate students (Group I). The second quiz, administered one month later, consisted of 25 questions and assessed the knowledge of lower limb gross anatomy among the residents and 42 undergraduate students (Group II). Results: The mean scores on the 42 upper limb questions were 27 ± 7 (60%, range 13-38) for the orthopedic residents, 17 ± 4 (37%, range 9-33) for the interns, and 18 ± 7 (40%, range 12-24) for the undergraduate students. The mean scores on the 25 lower limb questions were 20 ± 4 (80%, range 10-24) for the residents, 11 ± 5 (44%, range 3-18) for the interns, and 12 ± 4 (48%, range 3-19) for the students. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the gross anatomical knowledge of our orthopedic residents was suboptimal. This deficiency may stem from insufficient exposure to anatomy during undergraduate medical education. Therefore, orthopedic residents should regularly review and update their anatomical knowledge through collaboration and interdisciplinary courses conducted in conjunction with the Department of Anatomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.