ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2025
Shaping of olfactory responses by taste in a new assay for operant learning in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals are driven to maximize food rewards and adjust their behavior to seek high-quality food and avoid low-quality options. This holds true for Drosophila melanogaster, which approaches food-associated odors and tastes while avoiding aversive ones. Despite its importance for understanding motivation, how voluntary olfactory and gustatory experiences shape fly interactions with these stimuli over time remains unclear. Here, we investigate how stimuli shape volitional behavior using our novel operant learning assay (Open-LA), which tracks individual flies as they enter/exit a region of stimuli self-administration. We analyzed the behaviors flies demonstrated when they control access to an aversive or appetitive odor or taste and analyzed how these behaviors were shaped by experience. As predicted, flies pursued apple cider vinegar and avoided benzaldehyde and showed rapid operant learning for both odors. Flies also self-administered both simulated sweet and bitter taste, which slightly altered aversive odor responses, but did not strongly enhance odor-based operant learning. These data suggest olfaction is the primary sense guiding volitional behaviors and provides a behavioral framework for examining how animals pursue positive and avoid negative stimuli.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.