ArticleAnnals of botany2026
The interface between rare plant management and genetics: conserving Pitcher's thistle (Cirsium pitcheri) in the Great Lakes region, USA.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsTools showing best conservation practices are becoming critical for rare plant conservation as populations become isolated through habitat fragmentation and changing ecosystem processes. We illustrate the importance of reintroduction and assisted gene flow, using reintroduction of the USA federally threatened Pitcher's thistle (Cirsium pitcheri), a monocarpic perennial endemic to the western Great Lakes sand dunes. We evaluate the success of experimental reintroductions of this species into its dynamic coastal environment and address fundamental issues for rare plant reintroduction, including questions of maintenance of genetic diversity, founder size, introduction methods and assisted gene flow effectiveness.
methodsIn 1994 we initiated experimental reintroductions at three new locations along a habitat successional gradient using 4200 seeds collected from 54 maternal lines. At each site, seed sources were distributed among replicate blocks that were split by sowing method (sowing vs broadcasting) to examine establishment success. We monitored population demography for 30 years, assessing genetic variation in 2009 and regionally from 1997 to 2014. KEY
resultsTwo of three populations persisted for 30 years from a single-seeding founder event. Reintroduction populations had greater expected heterozygosity than regional native populations. Despite persistence, moderate inbreeding coefficients showed that reintroduction populations have not achieved an effective size to reduce the likelihood of inbreeding depression. However, the mid-successional reintroduction had the lowest kinship of all populations sampled, indicating a healthy restoration. Seed sowing produced three times as many seedlings as broadcasting, but seed source did not affect germination success. Persistence has been facilitated by local migration to suitable habitat patches, an important metapopulation process.
conclusionsSeeds can be an effective method for reintroducing monocarpic plants in high-quality habitats. However, low numbers of reproductive adults and moderate inbreeding illustrate the need for repeated additions of plants or seed to reduce inbreeding to improve rare plant genetic evolutionary potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.