ArticleThe New phytologist2025
Floral scent chemodiversity is associated with high floral visitor but low bacterial richness on flowers.
Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ecological role of emergent properties in the chemodiversity landscape.Nature ecology & evolution · 2026Review
- Wild origins, cultivated undertones: floral scent variation in Vanilla planifolia Andrews.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Floral scents are complex blends of volatile compounds, yet the influence of floral scent chemodiversity, the richness, evenness, and functional disparity of phytochemical compounds in shaping interactions with flower visitors and microbes remains largely unexplored. Using a dataset of alpine plant species, we investigated how floral scent chemodiversity affects flower visitor and bacterial diversities on flowers. Our results reveal that high floral scent chemodiversity is associated with increased flower visitor richness but reduced bacterial richness on flowers. These findings led us to propose the 'Filthy Pollinator Hypothesis'. Our hypothesis rests on two core ideas: flowers with chemodiverse scents attract a broader range of flower visitors, thereby increasing the potential for microbial transmission; and floral scent chemodiversity acts as a selective filter, mitigating the risks of unwanted microbial colonization by preventing the establishment of detrimental microbes while still allowing the establishment of a healthy microbiome. Floral scent chemodiversity may therefore not only shape the specialization/generalization of flower visitor assemblages but also act as a regulatory mechanism for microbial communities. By highlighting the multifunctionality of chemodiversity in structuring plant-animal and plant-microbe interactions, our study advances the understanding of chemodiversity and underscores its importance in plant ecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.