Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121967›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2026

How people decide to consume (more) alcohol when feeling stressed.

Jonas Dora, Maxwell Shinn, Amber Copeland, Elizabeth C Neilson, Nicole H Weiss, Katie Witkiewitz, James G Murphy, Matt Field, William H George, Kevin M King

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jonas DoraDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0651-8479
Maxwell ShinnInstitute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Amber CopelandSchool of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Elizabeth C NeilsonDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Nicole H WeissDepartment of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8245-0616
Katie WitkiewitzDepartment of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1086-3067
James G MurphyDepartment of Psychology, Memphis University, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9378-8754
Matt FieldSchool of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7790-5559
William H GeorgeDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Kevin M KingDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.

Funding

Exploring affect-motivated alcohol use as a value-based decision-making processK99AA030591 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DORA, JONAS · 2023 to 2024
$349k
NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA030591NIAAA NIH HHS K99AA030591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsThe tension reduction hypothesis suggests that people consume alcohol to alleviate stress. While previous studies showed stress increases alcohol's absolute value, alcohol's value relative to alternatives should be more relevant for drinking decisions. We aimed to test whether acute stress causes individuals to choose alcohol over appealing non-alcoholic alternatives and to identify the cognitive mechanisms underlying this choice behavior.

designLaboratory-based randomized 2 × 2 experimental study.

settingControlled laboratory environment including a simulated bar setting.

participants160 adults [56% male; mean age = 31 years; median Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) score = 8] who regularly consume alcohol.

interventionsParticipants first rated beverages and made repeated choices between alcoholic and non-alcoholic options. They then received either alcoholic beverages [target breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) = 0.06%] or non-alcoholic beverages, followed by either a personalized stress induction using autobiographical emotional memories or a neutral control procedure. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcomes were proportion of choices for alcoholic beverages and decision response times. Choice behavior was analyzed using drift diffusion modeling to decompose decisions into three mechanisms: decision carefulness (boundary parameter), sensitivity to prior preferences (drift rate) and bias toward alcohol regardless of preference (bias parameter).

findingsStress moderately increased choices for alcohol [95% highest density interval (HDI) = 0.01-0.13], but only in sober participants. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that stress primarily affected decision-making by inducing a bias toward alcohol during evidence accumulation (95% HDI = 0.19-0.76), without impacting decision carefulness or evidence sensitivity. This computational bias was stronger than observed in raw choice behavior, indicating that while stress consistently biased evaluation toward alcohol, this bias only sometimes overcame competing considerations (i.e. a person might reverse a preference from 'a little bit' to 'not really', but not from 'a little bit' to 'not at all').

conclusionsOur results support the tension reduction hypothesis by demonstrating that stress occasionally led individuals to choose alcohol even when they preferred the non-alcoholic alternative; however, this effect only appeared in sober participants who had not yet consumed any alcohol, suggesting the hypothesis primarily explains decisions about initiating rather than continuing drinking episodes.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingChoice BehaviorDecision MakingStress, PsychologicalAdultAlcoholic BeveragesFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adultaffect regulationalcoholdrift diffusion modelstresstension reduction hypothesisvalue‐based decision‐making

Identifiers

PMID41121967
PMCPMC12777759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.