Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121741›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2025

Memories of Trees Past: Coexistence Implications of Legacy Conspecific Density Dependence.

Lukas J Magee, Daniel J B Smith, David Bauman, Po-Ju Ke, Helene C Muller-Landau, Kristina J Anderson-Teixeira, Jessica Shue, David A Orwig, Sean McMahon, Stephanie Bohlman and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Mycorrhizal legacy mediates seedling success following timber harvesting in Northeastern forests.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Lukas J MageeSchool of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3124-2275
Daniel J B SmithDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4367-6556
David BaumanAMAP, Univ Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9115-6518
Po-Ju KeInstitute of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8371-7984
Helene C Muller-LandauSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancón, Panama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3526-9021
Kristina J Anderson-TeixeiraSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Ancón, Panama.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8461-9713
Jessica ShueSmithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3026-5838
David A OrwigHarvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7822-3560
Sean McMahonSmithsonian Environmental Research Center, Edgewater, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8302-6908
Stephanie BohlmanSchool of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4935-7321
Raelene M CrandallSchool of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0229-5418
Ben WeinsteinDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2176-7935
Sergio MarconiDepartment of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8096-754X
Jeremy W LichsteinDepart of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5553-6142
James F GilloolyDepart of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-3268
Robert BagchiDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4035-4105
Joseph A LaMannaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8229-7973
Daniel J JohnsonSchool of Forest, Fisheries and Geomatics Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8585-2143

Funding

NSF DEB-2240430NSF MRA-2106015Smithsonian ForestGEOTaiwan NSTC MOST 111-2621-B-002-001-MY3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Janzen-Connell Hypothesis posits that plant species diversity is maintained by a reduction in seedling survival near living conspecific trees relative to heterospecifics-known as negative conspecific density dependence (CDD). CDD facilitates coexistence if stronger than heterospecific density dependence (HDD). However, whether and how long CDD persists after trees die is unknown. In a three-year study across three forests, we monitored seedling survival near living and dead trees, both conspecific and heterospecific, across a seven-year chrono-sequence since tree death. CDD persisted for at least 5 years after tree death ('legacy CDD'), and most species showed stronger CDD relative to HDD through time. We used our empirical findings to parametrize a theoretical community dynamics model. Our model suggests that both stabilising niche differences and fitness differences persist after tree death. While legacy CDD can facilitate coexistence, fitness differences often overwhelmed niche differences, making competitive exclusion the most likely outcome.

Indexed as

BiodiversityTreesForestsModels, BiologicalPopulation DensitySeedlingsecological memoryfitness differencesgap dynamicsniche differencesspecies coexistencetree legacies

Identifiers

PMID41121741
PMCPMC12541246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.