ReviewAmerican journal of botany2025
Reconstructing the evolutionary history of herbaceous crops through trait-based ecology.
Review in American journal of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Genetic Diversity for Abiotic Stress Tolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Omics Technologies in Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Reconstructing the evolutionary history of herbaceous crops through trait-based ecology.American journal of botany · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reconstructing the evolution of crop plants is fundamental to understanding their origins, ecological adaptations, and impacts on ecosystem processes. However, our understanding of crop evolution stems largely from archaeology and genetics, with less focus on a trait-based ecological approach. Crop-specific studies have shown that phenotypic traits changed substantially during domestication and modern breeding. Yet, global comparative analyses across multiple species and traits remain scarce. Moreover, we largely ignore which plant traits distinguish wild species that were domesticated (progenitors) from those that were not, and how their ecological profiles differ. Here, I propose a conceptual model that integrates crops, their wild progenitors, and other non-domesticated herbaceous species into Grime's CSR theory and the integrated framework of plant form and function. This model provides insights into the evolutionary trajectories of domesticated plants along economics, root-microbial collaboration, and size spectra, shedding light on the ecological strategies of the wild progenitors of crops. After a comprehensive review, I emphasize that crops and their wild progenitors share similar resource-use traits, as progenitors were already highly acquisitive species. Conversely, main trait differences between domesticated and progenitor plants occur along size and collaboration axes, driven primarily by selection of large-seeded genotypes and intensive agricultural practices, respectively. I propose that crops deviate from the disturbance-adapted strategies of their wild progenitors toward more competitive ones, including links to different stages of evolution under cultivation. Finally, I outline implications for future breeding programs and the origins of agriculture, and recommend research directions to further advance our understanding of crop evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.