ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2025
Proactive fat grafting from the breast area in gynecomastia surgery: Impact on the prevention of contour irregularities and patient satisfaction.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Contour irregularities are among the most significant complications that may occur after gynecomastia surgery and they can adversely affect aesthetic outcomes. This study evaluated the use of proactively harvested autologous fat grafts from the same surgical field prior to gynecomastia surgery for the treatment of intraoperative contour deformities, as well as the impact of this approach on patient satisfaction. Material and Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 24 male patients who were diagnosed with gynecomastia between April 2023 and March 2025 through physical examination, endocrinology consultation, and breast ultrasonography, who subsequently underwent surgical treatment. Prior to surgery, autologous fat grafts were harvested from the breast area in all patients. Intraoperatively identified contour irregularities were treated with same-session fat injection using the previously harvested grafts. All patients were followed up with ultrasonography and digital photography. Additionally, patient satisfaction was assessed using BODY-Q chest module and the chest satisfaction questionnaire. Results: Of the 24 patients, 83% (n=20) presented with pseudogynecomastia and were treated with liposuction alone, while 17% (n=4) had gynecomastia and underwent liposuction combined with gland excision. Intraoperative contour irregularities were detected in 9 patients (37.5%), in whom an average of 8 cc (interquartile range 7-10) of fat was injected. Over a mean follow-up of 12.4 months, no statistically significant difference in aesthetic satisfaction was observed between patients with and without fat grafting (p>0.05). Both groups reported high satisfaction, and intraoperative contour deformities were successfully corrected. Conclusion: Proactively harvesting autologous fat from the breast tissue during gynecomastia surgery may be a safe and practical method for immediate correction of intraoperative contour irregularities. This approach avoids additional donor site morbidity and provides a readily available graft source. While satisfaction outcomes were high in all patients, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm the long-term efficacy and broader applicability of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.