ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025
Non-Invasive Imaging in Post-Radiotherapy Monitoring of Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer.
Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Multimodal Non-Invasive Skin Imaging in Dermatology: Current Modalities, Clinical Applications, and Future Integration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Radiation-induced skin injury: a review of pathophysiology, assessment, management, and re-irradiation protocols.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-melanoma skin cancers, including basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, are the most common forms of skin cancer worldwide. Though less aggressive than melanoma, they cause significant morbidity if untreated. Radiotherapy is a common treatment alternative for patients for whom surgery is contraindicated, particularly the elderly or those with tumors in anatomically challenging locations. Effective post-radiotherapy monitoring assesses treatment response, recurrence, and complications. Traditional post-radiotherapy monitoring often involves clinical examination and, if needed, invasive biopsies. Recently, noninvasive imaging modalities, such as reflectance confocal microscopy and line-field confocal optical coherence tomography, have gained attention. These technologies provide high-resolution, in vivo skin visualization. Reflectance confocal microscopy and line-field confocal optical coherence tomography offer complementary imaging data, facilitating the identification of residual tumor cells, inflammatory changes, and radiotherapy-induced skin alterations. They are valuable for follow-up as they monitor skin without biopsy. Early studies suggest high sensitivity and specificity in detecting treatment response and complications. Reflectance confocal microscopy and line-field confocal optical coherence tomography represent promising noninvasive tools for post-radiotherapy assessment of non-melanoma skin cancers. They enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce the need for biopsies, and may improve patient outcomes through earlier detection of recurrence or complications. Further studies are warranted to standardize imaging criteria and validate their routine clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.