ReviewSmall methods2026
Emerging Triboelectric Nanogenerators for In-Body Implantation.
Review in Small methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Bioelectronic Neural Interfaces: From Material Design to Closed-Loop Systems.Small methods · 2026Article
- Triboelectric metamaterial stents: self-powered motility monitoring in post-esophagectomy conduits.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Emerging Triboelectric Nanogenerators for In-Body Implantation.Small methods · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Emerging implantable medical devices (IMDs) collect critical health data for individualized treatment strategies, providing noninvasive, real-time monitoring to efficiently manage diseases. However, their reliance on conventional batteries introduces surgical risks and operational limitations, necessitating the exploration of alternative energy solutions, such as triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs). As these implantable TENGs develop, they are increasingly used to power medical devices and function as IMDs themselves. Despite improved design flexibility and compatibility with various functional materials, TENGs still face challenges in maintaining stable operation within the fluid environment in-body. This review provides an in-depth look at functional implantable TENGs in biomedical settings, highlighting the basic mechanism of TENGs and covering their electricity generation process, commonly used material combinations, and design methods. The review classifies implantable TENGs into four types: stretchable, bioadhesive, on-demand biodegradable, and stimuli-responsive, to address challenges after implantation. Additionally, this article discusses current developments and future possibilities, aiming to showcase new research avenues and opportunities by evaluating both existing applications and potential innovations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.