Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121584›Full record

ArticleMacromolecular rapid communications2025

Harmfulness Score: A Data-Driven Framework for Ranking Environmental Risks of Microplastics.

Fernando Gomes Souza, Shekhar Bhansali, Thomas Thundat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Macromolecular rapid communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fernando Gomes SouzaInstituto De Macromoléculas Professora Eloisa Mano, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Tecnologia-Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8332-4953
Shekhar BhansaliDept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Thomas ThundatDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University At Buffalo-The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Funding

Brazilian National Agency for Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels PRH 16.1Carlos Chagas Filho Foundation for Research Support of the State of Rio de JaneiroCoordination for the Improvement of Higher Education PersonnelNational Council for Scientific and Technological Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The analysis of 104,471 scientific abstracts on microplastics and nanoplastics using bibliometric tools and machine learning models produced a comprehensive mapping of thematic trends and material-specific risk associations. A composite Harmfulness Score was constructed by integrating sentiment analysis, impact descriptors, and network centrality metrics. This score ranked polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE) highest in association with terms such as oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity, reflecting their prominence in the literature. Reporting frequencies for key physicochemical descriptors were low-particle size (3.91%), density (0.01%), and surface area (<0.01%)-limiting their use in computational modeling and risk assessments. Thematic clustering revealed dominant topics such as environmental policy and biological impact, alongside emerging areas in microbial degradation, enzymatic transformation, and legal-policy intersections. The results highlight the need for standardized metadata practices and expanded use of analytical frameworks to enhance research reproducibility and policy relevance.

Indexed as

MicroplasticsParticle SizeRisk AssessmentMicroplasticsharmfulness Scoremachine learningmicroplasticspolymer risk assessmentregulatory science

Identifiers

PMID41121584
PMCPMC12713616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.