ReviewJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2026
Landscape analysis of pre-registered clinical trials involving classical psychedelics.
Review in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- 5-HTNature neuroscience · 2026Article
- High ventilation breathwork as a non-pharmacological model for inducing psychedelic-like states: expert evaluations of therapeutic potential and risk.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
- Dissociating the Hallucinogenic and Neuroplastic Effects of Psilocybin.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Psychedelics, the media portrayal and large-language model evaluations.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- Post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms following psychedelic use: a naturalistic survey study.Psychological medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychedelic clinical research is expanding rapidly. This review analyses the state and trends in psychedelic clinical trial registrations. A systematic search of ClinicalTrials.Gov was conducted on 11 November 2024, to identify registered interventional trials investigating (therapeutic) effects of serotonergic psychedelics (e.g. lysergic acid diethylamide [LSD], psilocybin, [5-MeO-]DMT). Analyses included a negative binomial regression to assess time trends and descriptive summaries of study characteristics. Outcomes included registration trends, substance distribution, study phase progression, sample and trial characteristics, geographical distribution and psychotherapy reporting. A total of 241 trials were identified, with registrations rising exponentially after 2006 and an acceleration post-2019. Two-thirds of trials are ongoing or planned. Psilocybin remains the most frequently studied substance and is most advanced towards approval, but short-acting psychedelics ([5-MeO-]DMT) have recently been introduced with a more focused clinical scope. Industry involvement is increasing, though university-led research still dominates. Reports of psychotherapy components increased following 2023 FDA recommendations, though no major improvements in intervention descriptions were observed. The rapid expansion of registered psychedelic clinical trials with diverse indications and substances reflects growing clinical interest. While university-led studies initiated early investigations and established a broad knowledge base, later industry involvement increasingly prioritizes scalability and economic considerations by adopting a focused approach towards clinical approval. Inconsistent reporting of psychotherapeutic components limits cross-study comparability and complicates systematic investigations into which combinations of therapeutic elements (type, timing, intensity) may optimize clinical outcomes. Future efforts should focus on complete and standardized trial reporting at study registration to minimize bias, reduce interpretative ambiguity and facilitate cross-trial comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.