ReviewThe British journal of radiology2025
Considering late effects costs in radiotherapy funding.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Radiotherapy treatment can have transformative effects on a patient's overall health and wellbeing, yet current funding models are constrained to curative and palliative aspects of treatment delivery. This therapeutic focus, obscures wider costs associated with radiotherapy, both at a service level and for individual patients and their families. It is essential that policy and services consider quality of life after treatment, including identification and management of long-term side effects. Currently, a lack of service provision means that many patients have no access to services equipped to manage late toxicity or are utilising inappropriate services for their needs which could also be more costly for commissioners. As Integrated Care Boards (ICBs) take greater responsibility for the whole cancer pathway there are potential patient and cost benefits of rolling out more supportive oncology and late effects services. This should be supported with better data, including Patient Reported Data (PRD) and research on the level of need for broader aspects of radiotherapy and post treatment aspects of patient experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.