Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121438›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2025

Anticholinergic burden and incident dementia: a Swedish nationwide case-control study.

Nanbo Zhu, Maria Eriksdotter, Sophie Liabeuf, Edwin C K Tan, Kristina Johnell, Sara Garcia-Ptacek, Hong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nanbo ZhuDepartment of Neurobiology, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. nanbo.zhu@ki.se.
Maria EriksdotterDepartment of Neurobiology, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sophie LiabeufDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
Edwin C K TanFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kristina JohnellDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sara Garcia-PtacekDepartment of Neurobiology, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Hong XuDepartment of Neurobiology, Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. hong.xu.2@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCumulative exposure to multiple drugs with anticholinergic properties, known as anticholinergic burden, has been linked to dementia risk. We aimed to thoroughly assess this relationship by examining not only anticholinergic potency, cumulative dose, and drug class, but also dementia subtype and severity.

methodsThis Swedish nationwide case-control study included 199,526 individuals aged ≥ 40 years with incident dementia between July 2008 and December 2017, with 1:1 matched controls based on age, sex, and region of residence. Each case-control group was allocated an identical drug exposure period. Using the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scale, we separately calculated the total defined daily doses (DDDs) of drugs with weak (ACB score of 1) and strong anticholinergic properties (ACB score of 2-3) prescribed ≥ 1 year before dementia onset. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (AORs) for the association between anticholinergic burden and all-cause dementia, with additional stratified analyses by drug class, dementia subtypes, and severity.

resultsA nonlinear dose-response relationship with all-cause dementia was found for the cumulative use of strong anticholinergics (e.g., 1-89 DDDs: AOR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.08-1.12]; ≥1095 DDDs: AOR, 1.66 [95% CI, 1.55-1.79]), notably within the class of urinary antispasmodics, antihistamines, and psychotropic drugs. In contrast, a subtle association lacking a dose-response pattern was observed for weak anticholinergics (e.g., 1-89 DDDs: AOR, 1.11 [95% CI, 1.08-1.13]; ≥1095 DDDs: AOR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.98-1.03]). The associations with strong anticholinergics were more pronounced in men, younger people, those diagnosed with vascular dementia or Lewy body dementia (versus Alzheimer's disease), and those with milder-stage dementia.

conclusionsUse of strong anticholinergics, but not weak ones, was associated with a higher risk of dementia, with the strength of association depending on cumulative dose, drug class, and dementia subtype. Caution should be exercised when prescribing drugs with strong anticholinergic properties to middle-aged and older individuals.

Indexed as

Cholinergic AntagonistsDementiaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedSwedenCholinergic AntagonistsAlzheimer’s diseaseAnticholinergic burdenLewy body dementiaVascular dementia

Identifiers

PMID41121438
PMCPMC12538848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.