ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025
Challenges in diagnostic and catheter ablation of long RP supraventricular tachycardia with eccentric activation and decremental properties: a case report.
Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLong RP supraventricular tachycardia poses a significant diagnostic challenge because of overlapping electrophysiological features among differential diagnoses. Detailed evaluation with an electrophysiological study is essential for accurate diagnosis and effective management, particularly when initial ablation attempts fail to eliminate inducibility. CASE PRESENTATION: A 40-year-old Southeast Asian male with a 5-year history of recurrent palpitations was referred for evaluation. Baseline echocardiography was normal. During symptomatic episodes, electrocardiography demonstrated long RP tachycardia. Electrophysiology study revealed eccentric atrial activation with decremental conduction, with the earliest A recorded at DD 9-10 (coronary sinus ostium/left posteroseptal region). Tachycardia cycle length was 410 ms, with a VA interval of 215 ms, AH interval of 93 ms, HA interval of 332 ms (AH/HA < 1), a VAV response during ventricular entrainment, PPI-TCL of 225 ms, and SA-VA of 194 ms. Ventricular reset did not terminate the arrhythmia and showed no atrial delay or advancement. Ablation at the coronary sinus ostium terminated the tachycardia but did not prevent reinduction. A subsequent slow pathway ablation was performed, during which slow junctional rhythm was observed. Post-ablation testing demonstrated crossover at 320 ms, while supraventricular tachycardia remained easily inducible with atrial S1 pacing at 400 ms. Given persistent inducibility, medical therapy was optimized and the patient was scheduled for advanced three-dimensional mapping and ablation. The leading differential diagnoses were atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (fast-slow variant) with a bystander accessory pathway and permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia with coexisting dual AV nodal physiology.
conclusionThis case illustrates the diagnostic complexity and management challenges of long RP supraventricular tachycardia, particularly in distinguishing atypical atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia. When initial ablation does not achieve full arrhythmia control, a stepwise strategy involving detailed electrophysiological evaluation, cautious ablation, and advanced mapping may be required to guide definitive therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.