Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121380›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2025

Engagement and retention in a motivational, discovery, and transitional track based substance use disorder recovery program: evaluation, facilitators and barriers.

Terry Lee Bunn, Robin Thompson, Madison Ashworth, Ernest Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Terry Lee BunnDepartment of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. tlbunn2@uky.edu.
Robin ThompsonFletcher Group Inc., London, KY, USA.
Madison AshworthFletcher Group Inc., London, KY, USA.
Ernest FletcherFletcher Group Inc., London, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSt. Matthew’s House® Justin’s Place® Recovery Program (JPRP) is a substance use disorder recovery housing program that employs Motivational, Discovery, and Transitional Tracks. This study examined whether resident retention, resumption of substance use, family relationship restoration, and acquisition of employment were associated with JPRP completion.

methodsSecondary quantitative data from individuals with a substance use disorder who were accepted into the JPRP program and who stayed for at least one day (n = 447) was collected from January 1, 2022-August 31, 2024. Characteristics of the JPRP and its residents were identified. Logistic regression was utilized to determine the resident and programmatic variables associated with the odds a resident successfully completed the JPRP. Outcomes included employment readiness, employment status, housing status, and family relationships at JPRP completion. Alumni data was self-reported from a convenience sample.

resultsOf the 447 residents in the study, 68% entered Discovery Track (approximately 30 days), 38% entered Transitional Track (approximately 270 days), and 35% graduated from the JPRP. Discovery Track is considered to be the “engagement phase”; 302 residents (100%) were engaged in JPRP using day 1 of the Discovery Track as the denominator, and the 12-month retention rate was 51% based on the number of residents who entered Discovery Track, or 35% based on the number who entered Motivational Track. Being court-ordered (on probation) at JPRP intake (OR 3.355; CI 1.479, 7.61), participating in regular case management meetings (OR 9.47; CI 3.822, 23.476), and gaining employment while in the JPRP (OR 58.856; CI 26.087, 132.791) were associated with higher odds of successful JPRP completion. Of the residents who completed the JPRP, 59% were actively engaged alumni, and 76% had not returned to use.

conclusionBeing court-ordered to attend a SUD program at JPRP intake, attending regular case management meetings, and gaining employment while in the JPRP were associated with successful JPRP completion. JPRP offerings of family restoration support, intensive case management, employment opportunities, and active alumni engagement have facilitated long-term recovery and reduced return to use.

Indexed as

MotivationSubstance-Related DisordersAdultEmploymentFamily RelationsFemaleHousingHumansJob SecurityMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationAlumni engagementCase managementEmploymentFamily restorationRecovery capitalRecovery housingRetention

Identifiers

PMID41121380
PMCPMC12542339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.