Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41121363›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

Dual mediolateral mini-open technique for the release of elbow contracture.

Hongru Ma, Lingzhe Xuan, Zhenjia Zhong, Zitao Zhang, Zezhang Zhu, Yong Qiu, Fengfeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hongru Ma *Department of Orthopaedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Lingzhe Xuan *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Zhongshan Rd. No. 321, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Zhenjia ZhongDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zitao ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Zezhang ZhuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Yong QiuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Fengfeng LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China. fengmale@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81873996National Natural Science Foundation of China CXZX202214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional surgical options for releasing stiff elbows include open and arthroscopic techniques. The former involves long incisions and significant surgical trauma, while the latter is technique-demanding and carries a higher risk of nerve complications. This study was designed to (1) introduce a novel dual mediolateral mini-open releasing technique for elbow stiffness, (2) analyze the clinical outcomes of our proposed technique, and (3) investigate its advantages and limitations for surgical release of elbow contracture.

methodsPatients who underwent dual medial and lateral mini-open surgeries for elbow stiffness performed by our surgical team between January 2017 and May 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months, were recruited. We recorded the maximum flexion and extension angles, range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, presence of heterotopic ossification, and ulnar neuropathy at each visit. Differences at pre-operative, post-operative, and last follow-up were analyzed. The lengths of surgical incisions and complications were also recorded.

resultsA total of 21 patients (11 males and 10 females) with an average age of 36.47 ± 9.81 years at surgery were enrolled. The average follow-up period was 29.76 ± 7.31 months. Lateral and medial incisions averaged 4.1 ± 0.3 cm and 3.0 ± 0.2 cm, respectively. Preoperatively, the maximum extension, flexion angle, and ROM were 37.14 ± 13.24°, 99.05 ± 19.25°, and 61.90 ± 21.07°, respectively. By the latest follow-up, extension and flexion angles were 6.81 ± 6.78° and 138.33 ± 6.78°, and the ROM was 131.52 ± 10.77°. Significant improvement was also observed in Mayo Elbow Performance and VAS scores. Preoperatively, 13 patients exhibited sensory or motor deficits secondary to ulnar nerve entrapment. At discharge, 5 patients demonstrated persistent neuropathy, with one new-onset case. By final follow-up, 3 cases with pre-existing entrapment maintained residual symptoms. No revision surgeries were needed in our cohort by the latest follow-up.

conclusionThe dual mediolateral mini-open technique allows for a safe and effective release of stiff elbows through small incisions of 3-5 cm in length. With comparable improvements to those reported in traditional surgical approaches, this technique could serve as a reliable alternative to arthroscopic release procedures, aiming for smaller incisions and reduced surgical trauma. However, it is not indicated for patients with severe elbow joint deformities.

Indexed as

ContractureElbow JointOrthopedic ProceduresAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultElbow stiffnessHeterotopic ossificationMini-open techniqueRelease

Identifiers

PMID41121363
PMCPMC12539053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.