ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
Dual mediolateral mini-open technique for the release of elbow contracture.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Traumatic elbow stiffness: pathogenic spectrum and comparative outcomes of minimally invasive versus open release surgery.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTraditional surgical options for releasing stiff elbows include open and arthroscopic techniques. The former involves long incisions and significant surgical trauma, while the latter is technique-demanding and carries a higher risk of nerve complications. This study was designed to (1) introduce a novel dual mediolateral mini-open releasing technique for elbow stiffness, (2) analyze the clinical outcomes of our proposed technique, and (3) investigate its advantages and limitations for surgical release of elbow contracture.
methodsPatients who underwent dual medial and lateral mini-open surgeries for elbow stiffness performed by our surgical team between January 2017 and May 2022, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months, were recruited. We recorded the maximum flexion and extension angles, range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, presence of heterotopic ossification, and ulnar neuropathy at each visit. Differences at pre-operative, post-operative, and last follow-up were analyzed. The lengths of surgical incisions and complications were also recorded.
resultsA total of 21 patients (11 males and 10 females) with an average age of 36.47 ± 9.81 years at surgery were enrolled. The average follow-up period was 29.76 ± 7.31 months. Lateral and medial incisions averaged 4.1 ± 0.3 cm and 3.0 ± 0.2 cm, respectively. Preoperatively, the maximum extension, flexion angle, and ROM were 37.14 ± 13.24°, 99.05 ± 19.25°, and 61.90 ± 21.07°, respectively. By the latest follow-up, extension and flexion angles were 6.81 ± 6.78° and 138.33 ± 6.78°, and the ROM was 131.52 ± 10.77°. Significant improvement was also observed in Mayo Elbow Performance and VAS scores. Preoperatively, 13 patients exhibited sensory or motor deficits secondary to ulnar nerve entrapment. At discharge, 5 patients demonstrated persistent neuropathy, with one new-onset case. By final follow-up, 3 cases with pre-existing entrapment maintained residual symptoms. No revision surgeries were needed in our cohort by the latest follow-up.
conclusionThe dual mediolateral mini-open technique allows for a safe and effective release of stiff elbows through small incisions of 3-5 cm in length. With comparable improvements to those reported in traditional surgical approaches, this technique could serve as a reliable alternative to arthroscopic release procedures, aiming for smaller incisions and reduced surgical trauma. However, it is not indicated for patients with severe elbow joint deformities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.