ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Ethnographic study of Buruli ulcer wound management practices in a traditional therapeutic setting in Ghana.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Making space for happenstance: a proposal for a different 'Theory of Change' to help understand and guide NTD policymaking practices.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionBuruli ulcer (BU) is a skin-related neglected tropical disease (skin NTD) considered to be a disease of the poor. This study explored BU wound management in a traditional therapeutic setting in the Atwima Mponua District of Ghana and described the social interactions observed.
methodEthnographic data about the practices of a herbalist renowned for his experience in treating BU wounds were obtained using direct observations, photography, and informal conversations.
resultsAt this therapeutic setting, we observed wounds cleaned and dressed using gloves, gauze, antiseptic solutions, non-sterile scissors, and a petrol and bark preparation supported with prayers. Most clients of the traditional healer indicated that they experienced their BU as a stubborn wound that needed powerful medicine to cure it, and believed the wounds might have supernatural origins. Key reasons clients provided for seeking care at the traditional therapeutic setting included trust in the traditional healer, his practices, respectful care, a friendly and non-stigmatising environment, low-cost and flexible payment options, and people's opinions about the potency of traditional plant medicines. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that the traditional healer enjoyed substantial public legitimacy from his clients due to his perceived interest in helping affected individuals achieve cures using culturally and financially appropriate ways to manage wounds. However, we also observed the use of non-sterile procedures and unregulated preparations, which may be potentially deleterious. The willingness of the traditional healer to collaborate with the formal healthcare system to meet the health needs of people with wounds could form the basis for future collaborative approaches between the two healthcare systems to address inequities regarding clients' access to care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.