ArticleBMC veterinary research2025
Breed-specific variations in canine spinal cord anatomy: conus medullaris and dural sac termination and filum terminale internum length.
Article in BMC veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thermosensitive Chitosan/Gelatin Hydrogels in Traditional Chinese Veterinary Medicine: A Prospective Review on Modernizing Acupoint Embedding.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Interventional pain management in dogs with lumbosacral stenosis: preliminary long-term clinical outcomes of combined foraminal and epidural injections with or without pulsed radiofrequency.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited research exists on breed differences in conus medullaris termination (CMT), dural sac termination (DST), and filum terminale internum length (FTIL). Dramatic vertebral column variations exist among breeds, suggesting possible differences in caudal spinal cord structures. This retrospective magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study aimed to investigate breed-related differences with three cohorts of dogs. Cohort 1 consisted of 117 dogs without spinal cord compression (SCC) to identify demographic influences. Cohort 2 included 37 Corgis with and without SCC to assess if SCC affects the CMT, DST, or FTIL. Cohort 3 comprised 163 dogs to assess the effects of tail morphology and breed.
resultsIn Cohort 1, heavier dogs had a more cranial CMT and DST (p=<0.001) and longer FTIL (p<0.001, R=0.47). Controlling with L2 mitigated this effect for FTIL (p=0.09, R=-0.16). Age was not associated with CMT or DST, but correlated with FTIL/L2 (p<0.001, R=0.31). Sex had no impact. Most breeds had their CMT at L6. Only Cavalier King Charles Spaniels (CKCS) and Corgis reached the sacrum, while Boston Terriers ended more cranially at L5 or L6. Cohort 2 showed no significant difference in CMT, DST or FTIL/L2 between Corgis with and without SCC (p=0.5, 0.18, and 0.46, respectively). In Cohort 3, weight and tail type affected CMT and DST (p<0.001). Ninety-six percent of normal tailed dogs had a CMT at L6 or L7 while screw tailed breeds ranged from L4-L7 and CKCS terminated at L7 or in the sacrum. These trends were similar for the DST. FTIL/L2 differed between groups with CKCS having a higher ratio and widest range and screw tails the lowest ratio (p<0.001) compared to normal tails. Among breed investigation, CMT differed for CKCS, Corgis, Boston Terriers, English Bulldogs and French Bulldogs versus normal tailed dogs (p<0.001). Similarly, DST varied among breed and by weight (p=<0.001). CKCS and German Shepherds had higher FTIL/L2 ratios, while Boston Terriers, French Bulldogs, and Labradors were lower than other breeds.
conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of considering breed when evaluating the caudal spinal cord anatomy. Variation in the CMT, DST, and FTIL were influenced by weight, tail-type, and breed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.